Cheat Sheet
Truth in Testing
Articles in this series examine cheating in education and efforts to stop it.
Before Twitter, before email, an old teacher friend of mine used to stuff photocopied articles he liked into mailboxes of other teachers he thought would appreciate the stuff. This daily act of sharing he called his paper route.
ORLANDO, Fla. — The frontier in the battle to defeat student cheating may be here at the testing center of the University of Central Florida.
Truth in Testing
Articles in this series examine cheating in education and efforts to stop it.
Readers shared their thoughts on this article.
No gum is allowed during an exam: chewing could disguise a student’s speaking into a hands-free cellphone to an accomplice outside.
The 228 computers that students use are recessed into desk tops so that anyone trying to photograph the screen — using, say, a pen with a hidden camera, in order to help a friend who will take the test later — is easy to spot.
Scratch paper is allowed — but it is stamped with the date and must be turned in later.
When a proctor sees something suspicious, he records the student’s real-time work at the computer and directs an overhead camera to zoom in, and both sets of images are burned onto a CD for evidence.
Taylor Ellis, the associate dean who runs the testing center within the business school at Central Florida, the nation’s third-largest campus by enrollment, said that cheating had dropped significantly, to 14 suspected incidents out of 64,000 exams administered during the spring semester.
“I will never stop it completely, but I’ll find out about it,” Mr. Ellis said.
When summer ends, many teachers will face a new reality: A number of states have passed new laws and policies that tie teachers' job security to how well their students do in class. Some teacher groups dropped their longstanding opposition to this idea, and now say it will be good for the profession. Still, many teachers fear the new evaluation systems are part of an attack on their profession.
//
But there was one interesting observation made by a philanthropist who gives books
to disadvantaged kids. It’s not the physical presence of the books that produces
the biggest impact, she suggested. It’s the change in the way the students see
themselves as they build a home library. They see themselves as readers, as
members of a different group.The Internet-versus-books debate is conducted on the supposition that the medium is
the message. But sometimes the medium is just the medium. What matters is the
way people think about themselves while engaged in the two activities. A person
who becomes a citizen of the literary world enters a hierarchical universe.
There are classic works of literature at the top and beach reading at the
bottom.A person enters this world as a novice, and slowly studies the works of great
writers and scholars. Readers immerse themselves in deep, alternative worlds and
hope to gain some lasting wisdom. Respect is paid to the writers who transmit
that wisdom.A citizen of the Internet has a very different experience. The Internet smashes
hierarchy and is not marked by deference. Maybe it would be different if it had
been invented in Victorian England, but Internet culture is set in contemporary
America. Internet culture is egalitarian. The young are more accomplished than
the old. The new media is supposedly savvier than the old media. The dominant
activity is free-wheeling, disrespectful, antiauthority disputation.These different cultures foster different types of learning. The great essayist Joseph
Epstein once distinguished between being well informed, being hip and being
cultivated. The Internet helps you become well informed — knowledgeable about
current events, the latest controversies and important trends. The Internet also
helps you become hip — to learn about what’s going on, as Epstein writes, “in
those lively waters outside the boring mainstream.”But the literary world is still better at helping you become cultivated, mastering
significant things of lasting import. To learn these sorts of things, you have
to defer to greater minds than your own. You have to take the time to immerse
yourself in a great writer’s world. You have to respect the authority of the
teacher.Right now, the literary world is better at encouraging this kind of identity. The
Internet culture may produce better conversationalists, but the literary culture
still produces better students.
'New learning' is an approach to education that engages students as active designers and co-designers of their own knowledge. 'New literacies' aims to expand learners' meaning-making modes and capacities, and uses digital media to enhance student learning.
Designed for Teachers
This exciting, new online masters program anticipates a near future where education is even more central to society, the economy and personal opportunity than it is today. Education will be ubiquitous, available at any time and in any place, taking place not just at school, but at home, at work and in community settings. The emerging new digital media will occupy a central position in New Learning.
Participants in this program will be teachers of literacy and teachers in other discipline areas who wish to investigate language across the curriculum. Participants selected to join the program will have training and professional experience ranging from the early years of schooling to adult learning. The program supplements traditional, alphabetical notions of literacy (including the literacies required for learning across a wide range of discipline areas), with a broader conception of literacy in the context of new media, global communications and cultural and linguistic diversity.